Why The Establishment Loves J6
and their inconsistent pearl clutching narrative begs an alternative
Note: This one is going to be heavily opinion based, but will include assertions that are falsifiable. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. I’m pissing like a racehorse on every third rail topic I can think of here so reader discretion is advised.
The 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump to the fullest extent that an election can be stolen. From the “election fortification” outlined by Time magazine to the detailed analysis of how non-profit money bankrolled a robust network of mules1 to cast votes that exceeded the margin of victory by the most conservative possible measurements, this is totally obvious to anyone who has been paying attention. Back when there were constitutional remedies for this egregious subversion of our republic, the cathedral knew they had to do something to ensure that the fix was finalized. Psyop campaigns2 targeting gullible conservatives with stories about voting machine companies being owned by communist countries that were easily disproved with cursory examination were allowed to be promoted. Vulnerable issues like signature matching and legal challenges to the constitutionality of last minute extra-legislative changes to voting law went ignored or were actively suppressed. The media told us that it was “the most secure election in history” just like they would soon repeat ad-nauseam that COVID vaccines were “safe and effective”. Frustrated conservatives from across the country felt like their voices weren’t being heard, so they did what they thought was their right as Americans: They went to Washington D.C. to protest. Unfortunately for them, the establishment was ready. Fresh off of his assignment in Michigan where he orchestrated the entrapment of several gullible Michiganders to create a sympathetic narrative for the deeply unpopular COVID authoritarian Governor Gretchen Whitmer, FBI Special Agent Steven D’antuono was on hand in Washington to replicate this success on January 6th.
FBI informants that would come to be identified at “unindicted co-conspirators” were active throughout Capitol while intelligence was withheld to ensure that the United States Capitol Police (USCP) staffing was inadequate. Antifa goons wearing their typical garb agitated and caused property damage per usual, but some of them held Trump flags to play to the credulous media. Disgruntled Americans intent on having their voices heard who were committed to protesting peacefully were lured into the Capitol building by waves of friendly Capitol police. None were armed, and none physically harmed anyone.
In spite of this, there were two deaths directly associated with January 6th. 35 y/o Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt and 42 y/o USCP Officer and military veteran Brian Sicknick.
The fact that these deaths were used to push the narrative that this was a violent insurrection that threatened our democracy is so absurd that it would be funny if the deaths weren’t so damned tragic. Ashli was summarily executed by Capitol Police Lieutenant Michael Byrd while attempting to climb through a broken window. Subsequent investigation found that there was insufficient evidence to charge Byrd with a crime, but this doesn’t mean that Ashli’s slaying was justified.
When Brian Sicknick died of a stroke, the New York Times wasted no time rushing to publish a fabricated story that he died after being “struck in the head with a fire extinguisher”. His “murder” was then used as a primary justification for impeachment, and was even used to explain the dangers of extremism in Army training I was party to months after the fact. Andrew McCarthy of the National Review does a good job of admitting his complicity in pushing this false story outlining what should have been known by who and when in this Yahoo News article, but I think the notion that Brian Sicknick died from natural causes is wishful thinking on the part of the establishment. Using superior journalistic standards to the NY Times (read: no one can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any aspects of my alternative narrative are outright false), Brian Sicknick suffered fatal strokes shortly after being one of the first few USCP officers to receive a COVID vaccine. For anyone sufficiently disconnected from reality to still subscribe to the “safe and effective” narrative, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded over 20,000 deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Multiple independent analyses using different lines of reasoning and supporting data (such as CMS data) have demonstrated that an under reporting factor of 40x for VAERS is within the 95% confidence interval. This means that we can be over 95% confident that 400,000 deaths within the U.S. are associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Even though these deaths are probably weighted towards older individuals with various comorbidities, Pfizer’s randomized controlled trial (RCT) informs us that 24% more individuals died in the treatment arm (vaccine group) of the study used to attain the FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for their Comirnaty/bnt162b2 vaccine. Notably, this RCT enrolled participants very much like Brian Sicknick, young and healthy individuals mostly under the age of 60. Since a 24% increase in all-cause mortality in this RCT overwhelms the 2.5% share of deaths in Brian’s age cohort attributable to stroke (aka cerebrovascular accident) from 2000-2020, COVID-19 vaccination would be the probable cause of death if Brian received it. Though we have a statement that “the majority” of USCP hadn’t received the vaccine as of 19JAN21, it is reasonable to assume that Brian Sicknick was in the minority of USCP officers that received the vaccine prior to that time and suffered a fatal stroke as a result.
You might have heard about additional deaths associated with J6. This newsweek article outlines how the January 6th “attacks saw the deaths of several people”, but if you actually read the article, all of the deaths can be classified as follows:
“natural causes” aka potential vaccine injuries3
“suicides” of 4 Capitol Police aka potential Jeffrey Esptein style slayings4
One drug overdose
One summary state sponsored execution5
Following January 6th, these events have been used to persecute hundreds of political dissidents. If not for the orchestration of the FBI, would the Capitol Building ever have been breached? I doubt it. I don’t underestimate what Steven D’antuono and the U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland could have accomplished working together. Why do I bring up Merrick Garland? Because he has been involved with these sorts of right-wing FBI entrapment schemes all the way back to PATCON in the early 1990’s.
It will likely be some years before the dust settles and we are able to employ the weaponized autism of the hydra/internet hivemind to analyze the thousands of hours of video footage currently being jealously guarded. Once that has been done we will probably be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt what intuition already assures anyone who isn’t hopelessly blue pilled. In the meantime, given that we know the anti-Americans who control the establishment have demonstrated time and again that the ends always justify the means, and progressives are drawn by the Iron Law of Acceleration to the political utopia that finally seems within reach after a decades long march, the cathedral will not allow this alternative narrative to see the light of day until long after that time has passed.
To recap, a managerial elite unified in their contempt for orange man used every available means (most of which were illegal and unconstitutional) to overthrow the popular will of the American people, eliminate constitutional remedies to this coup, and railroad anyone who expresses dissent with legal processes descended from the patriot act, all while continuing to steal trillions dollars from anyone that holds USD.6 To add insult to injury, since they can’t just give the money to themselves without laundering it, we get to enjoy mandates for vaccines that don’t work and a non-trivial risk of WWIII and nuclear war erupting in Europe.7
In my first article on this publication I outlined the how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) characterizes anyone who does what I’ve done here (question the integrity of the 2020 Presidential election and the safety and efficacy of COVID vaccines) as a “threat actor”. I think this is confession through projection on the part of the establishment. I believe that these individuals are willing to do unspeakable things to maintain power, and want nothing more than for political dissidents to engage in violence in order to improve the popularity of ever more authoritarian measures. I believe that their ultimate aim is to place control of the United States Government “safely” outside the influence of popular opinion/sentiment. This is why I said in the title that they love January 6th. Their pearl clutching is protesting just a little too much. Since I’m confident that political dissidents are too principled8 to engage in any acts of violence, people like D’antuono and Garland will be under a lot of pressure to repeat their outstanding success on January 6th. Here’s hoping they can’t think of anything worthwhile and we make it through the next election without any (additional) false flag events. Perhaps if some non-establishment types get elected, the additional oversight might deter such actions on the part of anti-Americans frothing at the mouth to abolish every last semblance of constitutional governance9.
Note: To be clear, contrary to DTAS bulletin assertions that exercising 1st amendment rights to explore these issues is dangerous, I think a rational discussion of these topics provides a disincentive to political violence. False flags are only successful if they are believed by the public, hence my efforts here. Conversely, I haven’t seen any evidence that anyone has ever committed an act of political violence that could be attributed to believing a "false flag” narrative of events. It doesn’t escape me that this is exactly what the establishment is asserting as the cause of January 6th, but as I’ve demonstrated, the only one who was killed Ashli Babbitt, and that was at the hands of the establishment.
Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules makes a persuasive case that fraudulent votes exceeded the margin of victory in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
Although heart disease given the age of the other individuals (55 and 50 y/o respectively) and the fact that they weren’t 1st responders suggests to me that their deaths were not likely to have been precipitated by vaccination.
Ever since Jeffrey Epstein “killed himself” while under suicide watch consisting of 24 hour surveillance by video and 2 guards in a federal detention facility, I’ve had a reasonable suspicion that politically expedient deaths ruled as suicides in the vicinity of the National Capitol region are not, in fact, suicides.
There is no evidence that Byrd’s shooting of Ashli Babbitt was required for self-defense or for the protection of any other individual.
This is a reference to exploding inflation rates.
mRNA Vaccine uptake and weapons shipments to Ukraine have been instrumental in increasing certain stock valuations. These stocks are disproportionately owned by members of the politically connected managerial elite.
It should be obvious that being a political dissident is generally not in ones interest economically, grifters excluded. Principle is the general reason that a political dissident is willing to endure pain. The political principles of those concerned that the outcome of the 2020 election was influenced by fraud are generally aligned with the rule of law and adherence to the constitution. It doesn’t make sense that these individuals would believe that political violence is justified as it is not a constitutionally acceptable remedy.
"Democrats weaponize their available power to try to overturn Roe by various unconstitutional threats, including Pentagon ignoring it, DOJ suggesting FDA abortion pills override local abortion laws, and AOC calling for a combination of court-packing and illegal federal legislation on Roe while their minions scream on TikTok, "protesters" rage in the streets and activists threaten violence on pro-life pregnancy centers.” -Robert Barnes summary of events following the overturning of Roe v. Wade 26JUN22
You’re by no means keeping things close to the chest, and I admire that. The hearings on January 6th have certainly felt like a misguided witch hunt for a while now. The instigation of the FBI would be no surprise, but the death of Sicknick from a vaccination with so much political weight feels too narratively convenient. The evidence is flimsy in all directions, and everyone has their motives to paint it in a certain light. Regardless, my eyes have been opened to new possibilities no doubt. But if your mission is to proselytize to the unsure, this reads a tad extreme. Or should I say, radical….
The news site Revolver did coverage of Jan 6th with astonishing detail: photos, videos, eye-witness accounts and more. Effectively, the Trump supporters were herded into the Capitol Building. The protest was hijacked -- with Ray Epps only the tip of the iceberg. Several operatives were involved -- using megaphones, wire-cutters, and more. But none of whom the FBI or the Jan 6th commission have shown any interest in identifying -- let alone having them testify under oath. It screams FED, FED, FED. No doubt you know these articles well, but I would encourage anyone who wants to learn more to visit: https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/revolver-january-6th-investigative-series-summary/
Full agreement on QANON, which mixed obvious truths with outlandish conspiracies in order to discredit all those concerns with the obvious truths about corruption in Permanent Washington.
Ashli Babbitt was murdered. The MSM failed to ask even basic questions. Why didn't any other police officers feel the need to draw their service weapons and shoot? (How often does it happen that only one officer in a group draws out their service weapon and kills someone with it?). Why was the man who was breaking down the door not shot --- if this was the danger? Why was the video showing Ashli Babbitt clearly trying to de-escalate the situation never shared on the MSM? How could this short and relatively slender, unarmed woman be identified as a deadly threat requiring lethal force? Etc. It goes beyond mind-boggling incompetence. It was malice.
You write: "the managerial elite unified in their contempt for orange man used every available means (most of which were illegal and unconstitutional) to overthrow the popular will of the American people, eliminate constitutional remedies to this coup, and railroad anyone who expresses dissent with legal processes descended from the patriot act, all while continuing to steal trillions dollars from anyone that holds USD." Well said!
From a different perspective on the USD matter, and a post you may or may not know, Brian McGlinchey at Stark Realities did an excellent take: "Weaponized Dollar May Explode in America's Face ~~ By incentivizing foreign governments to seek currency alternatives, U.S.-led sanctions could end the dollar's global dominance and cause havoc at home" @ https://starkrealities.substack.com/p/weaponized-dollar-may-explode-in
Our elites have put us all at risk for permanent inflation, food shortages, the internal destruction of our republic, and even nuclear war.
In contrast to the American and global trends, when the leadership in Sweden decided to forgo the Covid lockdowns and school closures, Johan Giesecke quoted the former Swedish statesmen and Lord High Chancellor Axel Gustafsson Oxenstierna: “An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur." ~~ “Don’t you know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?” @ https://fcpp.org/2022/06/21/sweden-did-it-right-we-did-it-wrong-reprise
It's beyond a lack of wisdom. Our elites are outright stupid parasite-predators, but enabled by a highly skilled technocratic class who expect to survive and even profit from the coming chaos. To speak *metaphorically*: the master might be a buffoon, but the pack of hunting dogs as his command still must be respected. To mix the metaphor: the bodyguards, as it were, are well-trained and can shot straight. Not to be underestimated. All best!