Courts don't, won't, and never have stopped tyranny -- anywhere. The courts are one of the last things to go before the big push to complete the tyrannical control loop.
I know you know that. But others might still be holding out hope.
There's nobody coming to save us. People have to stop playing this game, and refuse to budge. Otherwise, this doesn't end well for anybody.
Don't misunderstand, I'm not talking about taking up arms. I'm talking about NOT playing along with the crazy-ass power structure. COVID was the best example. The level of nonsense that went on in the name of public health can never again be allowed. That starts with people not going along in the first place. Once enough people stop buying the nonsense, the control system begins to collapse.
If you can run a stop sign, you can say no to nonsense government encroachment as well. That's my new saying... šš
I see a rejection of natural law as more compatible with your rejection of Constructivism, but I understand where youāre coming from. I think math exists to the same extent that natural law exists (either both are constructs or they have qualities that can be objectively defined). I believe the latter so that is the perspective youāre getting when I reference law.
Neither the Constitution nor law as a practical matter have anything to do with natural law, unless you are claiming that natural law dictates that a person be counted as 3/5 of a person - but only some people and only sometimes.
I see the Constitution as broadly compatible with natural law. Regarding 3/5 rule I think Lysander Spooner had the right of it in The Unconstitutionality of Slavery.
"I see the Constitution as broadly compatible with natural law." Well, that settles it, I guess. The 3/5 rule is simply one example of the absurdities that come from trying to pretend that the law that is is the law that should be.
Even if the Constitution or any other law were to have dropped from the heavens (it didn't and they didn't) - none of them are self executing.
Quote Bible verses at an armed robber and see what happens. He already knows that Thou Shalt Not Steal Hold a .357 Magnum to that robber's head and he will be the one to quote Scripture, and he will not care whether you have the legal right to pull the trigger or not.
Reading this another way. It could provide assistance with infiltrators and maybe illegal aliens. But I suggest folks talk with their sheriff's office and find out what's going on
Oh Jim the sheriff I have the displeasure of dealing with would love to weaponize the military industrial complex against the citizenry. Might have to do with the $500 million I have claimed against their indemnity bond
Surrender
Or fight
Die
Iād rather go meekly to the delousing showers than ask tyrants for permission to sue the tyrant.
Stop.š
š¤£
The Supreme Court addressed slavery and we got a civil war
The Supreme Court addressed Jim Crow š¦āā¬ and we got 100 years of jim crow
The Supreme Court changed its Holy Minds and we got affirmative action
And abortions
Gay marriage
STOP š š¤£
in my defense Iām really only trying to call attention to the absurdity of it/belabor the importance of Constitutional Gnosis.
Youāre very correct in a Republic every citizen has responsibility.
Ok
"Reasonably forseeable" is doing a hell of a lot of work in this justification for the military to assassinate Americans.
As if there was not already enough evidence that bureacrats should not have the ability to make laws.
Remember FDR?
Thatās FDR
Well, FDR is long dead but his ilk have proliferated and metastisized.
This violates the posse comitatus act, which IS current law, and an exception to that act, the insurrection act.
That seems obvious to us, but if COVID taught me anything its that the power of motivated reasoning and confirmation bias is not to be underestimated.
š¤£How long before SCOTUS addresses this issue?š¤£
SIR STOP SIR š¤£š¤£
Listen: weāre just a regular country now.
Iād rather die than ask a lawyer to help on this, really.
Courts don't, won't, and never have stopped tyranny -- anywhere. The courts are one of the last things to go before the big push to complete the tyrannical control loop.
I know you know that. But others might still be holding out hope.
There's nobody coming to save us. People have to stop playing this game, and refuse to budge. Otherwise, this doesn't end well for anybody.
Don't misunderstand, I'm not talking about taking up arms. I'm talking about NOT playing along with the crazy-ass power structure. COVID was the best example. The level of nonsense that went on in the name of public health can never again be allowed. That starts with people not going along in the first place. Once enough people stop buying the nonsense, the control system begins to collapse.
If you can run a stop sign, you can say no to nonsense government encroachment as well. That's my new saying... šš
But reality encroaches.
As far as arms
Well
The disclaimer unnecessary
The world does
Yes, including the neighbors
To explain; of course you may defy this government
It is dissolving. šØ
The next fellows, I would notā¦
Not 'From paragraph 3.3.a(1)(c)' but 'From paragraph 3.3.a(2)(c)'
Wrong sub-sub-para typo.
haha, good catch, updated, thanks!
I never thought Iād see it.
When possee comitatus becomes Commie positato.
The only proper response to this is to shoot first and take their weapons and ammunition.
Thatās what I was thinking too. But if air reinforcements is called in, guess it wonāt matter
Afghan tactics: hide from jets but run to deep cover from troop carrying helos
Good thing we have our own document that authorizes lethal force against them.
So, When Scalps?
Framing the MSM as a "democratic institution" is a stretch, but the law is whatever the rulers say it is at the moment.
This is normal history
Also normal laws
If the rulers say 2+2=5 does that make it so? Iād say that it doesnāt.
Unlike math, which can be independently determined, there is no such thing as law. There is only context.
I see a rejection of natural law as more compatible with your rejection of Constructivism, but I understand where youāre coming from. I think math exists to the same extent that natural law exists (either both are constructs or they have qualities that can be objectively defined). I believe the latter so that is the perspective youāre getting when I reference law.
Neither the Constitution nor law as a practical matter have anything to do with natural law, unless you are claiming that natural law dictates that a person be counted as 3/5 of a person - but only some people and only sometimes.
I see the Constitution as broadly compatible with natural law. Regarding 3/5 rule I think Lysander Spooner had the right of it in The Unconstitutionality of Slavery.
"I see the Constitution as broadly compatible with natural law." Well, that settles it, I guess. The 3/5 rule is simply one example of the absurdities that come from trying to pretend that the law that is is the law that should be.
Even if the Constitution or any other law were to have dropped from the heavens (it didn't and they didn't) - none of them are self executing.
Quote Bible verses at an armed robber and see what happens. He already knows that Thou Shalt Not Steal Hold a .357 Magnum to that robber's head and he will be the one to quote Scripture, and he will not care whether you have the legal right to pull the trigger or not.
We're at that point in time that the 2 amendment was written for. When the government won't uphold the Constitution, it becomes our duty to do it.
Plus SCOTUS just rules the chevron deference!! Itās almost like every branch is broken in govwhorement ;-)
why cant ron paul b arrested 4 saying this 2 the public by lying like this? they are inciting violence on citizens?!
Reading this another way. It could provide assistance with infiltrators and maybe illegal aliens. But I suggest folks talk with their sheriff's office and find out what's going on
Oh Jim the sheriff I have the displeasure of dealing with would love to weaponize the military industrial complex against the citizenry. Might have to do with the $500 million I have claimed against their indemnity bond
I live flyover midwest. I think our sheriff's must be different
Perhaps they uphold their oath of office, mine canāt spell oath
Balkans/ Yugoslavia.
Heh, would've been fun if they succeeded during one of the previous attempts of You Know What and summoned this in defense.